ST Alpha - "That's the case in voting for one of the two. Not voting at all knowing that the person you like least is going to win is lunacy. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

That's the case in voting for one of the two. Not voting at all knowing that the person you like least is going to win is lunacy. -- nm

Posted by spamlet Nov 4 '15, 07:23

(No message)

Responses:

[deleted] 6
- So, the message here is if you don't like either candidate, you shouldn't vote at all? -- nm - Jim Nov 4, 07:28 3
  - In our election, people were advised to spoil their ballots if they felt this way. And we have vastly more choice ... - Beryllium Nov 4, 07:29
  - *agrees with this* -- nm - Will Hunting Nov 4, 07:29
  - [deleted]
- (TBF, there's a ton of this reasoning I hear from people for supporting Clinton) -- nm - Reagen Nov 4, 07:28
- You're not going to disagree with them on everything. You pick the least bad of the options. -- nm - spamlet Nov 4, 07:28
Well, I can only speak for myself, but I voted for the independent candidate who, while inexperienced and imperfect, ran the most thoughtful campaign. -- nm - emoticripple Nov 4, 07:24 5
- Well, that's not "not voting". -- nm - Jim Nov 4, 07:26 2
  - He said many didn't; not he didn't (at least from what I read). -- nm - Will Hunting Nov 4, 07:32 1
    - But spammy's point was that not voting at all was lunacy. Casting the 3rd party vote is absolutely the way to let it be known that you don't like the - Jim Nov 4, 07:34
- In your case, that's different. When you said stayed at home, I assume you meant didn't vote at all. -- nm - spamlet Nov 4, 07:26 1
  - No, I just didn't give money or knock on doors. -- nm - emoticripple Nov 4, 07:36

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.