Backboards: 
Posts: 157

when I bb'd and read the politico story on ben carson, I didn't think it was necessarily as damning towards him as comments suggested.

turns out that may be because, by the time I read it, it had been changed, only they didn't note that it had been. see link below for cnn fact-checking them and outing that they didn't note edits were made.

(my thinking was along the lines for the full-ride scholarship part that I could see someone saying that as a shortening of "all expenses paid" plus some of the other things could just be slips instead of outright intentional obfuscating.)

I'd go read their piece again to see if it's changed more, but life is too short.



Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.