Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
In response to
"
I'm glad that Abrams owned up to the Star Trek Into Darkness debacle.
"
by
David
Which debacle? The whole movie? -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Nov 9 '15, 07:52
(No message)
Responses:
I thought it was ok. But then I had super low expectations going into it. -- nm
-
Loyola
Nov 9, 07:56
Basically yes. Also, Super 8, which was a tremendous idea that had major third act problems.
-
David
Nov 9, 07:55
4
Here's the link -- (link)
-
Roger More
Nov 9, 07:57
2
But the accelerated production on the Star Wars movie was just fine. It'll all be fine. Fine, fine, fine. -- nm
-
Mop
Nov 9, 08:33
What I like about Abrams is that he loves movies.
-
David
Nov 9, 07:59
The 3rd act was so shaky, even Kyle Chandlers' hair looked askew. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 9, 07:56
Untrue. But read the interview.
-
Spawn
Nov 9, 07:54
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
