Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 168
In response to
"
Wait, this is a sequel to the other Hunstsman movie? I feel like this is completely unnecessary. -- nm
"
by
sycor
prequel -- nm
Posted by
Roger More (aka rogermore)
Nov 16 '15, 13:56
(No message)
Responses:
either way. Complete not necessary. -- nm
-
sycor
Nov 16, 13:59
6
Universal will give you 155 million reasons why it is necessary :) -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 16, 14:01
5
try nearly $400 million. -- nm
-
Remlik
Nov 16, 14:02
4
I would have never guessed this. I only remembered it not making back it's budget in the US.
-
sycor
Nov 16, 14:06
2
Except for Stewart I really liked it. Theron was terrific in it...plays a great villian -- nm
-
Remlik
Nov 16, 14:11
1
even Spawn liked it except for Stewart. -- nm
-
Remlik
Nov 16, 14:14
Ah true, I was being US myopic. -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 16, 14:03
(and that implies the first movie was necessary) -- nm*
-
Roger More
Nov 16, 13:56
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
