ST Alpha - "In reading the article he was referring to an amicus brief, so how much of what he is quoted as saying is him" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "I was just discussing this and I can't believe this is the thought process of a justice on the Supreme Court. -- (edited)" by Krusty

In reading the article he was referring to an amicus brief, so how much of what he is quoted as saying is him

Posted by TWuGbacca (aka TWuG) Dec 9 '15, 12:26

saying "in this brief it says X, how do you answer that" versus "I agree with what this brief says, it reflects my thinking"?

We can infer from past rulings, but the article is light on the necessary context to make the determination in this instance.

Responses:

[deleted] 4
- [deleted] 3
  - I understood the gist of the words, I just wasn't sure if they were his or the brief's. -- nm - TWuGbacca Dec 9, 12:40 1
    - [deleted]
  - 79 . . . *counting out eight on his fingers* -- nm - jar jar trump Dec 9, 12:35

Post a message top

In reading the article he was referring to an amicus brief, so how much of what he is quoted as saying is him

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.