ST Alpha - "Study: Scalia Better Off in “Less Advanced” Court -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 177

Study: Scalia Better Off in “Less Advanced” Court -- (link)

Posted by TWuGbacca (aka TWuG) Dec 10 '15, 14:24

(No message)

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/study-scalia-better-off-in-less-advanced-court (www.newyorker.com)

Responses:

Study: Majority happy to lie about what he actually said. -- nm - Endor Dec 10, 14:35 27
- here is the transcript -- (link) - jar jar trump Dec 10, 14:37 26
  - Isn't the point of aff,action that students who might not score well because of their background that possibly held them back, so it's not that they - General Zeit Dec 10, 15:19
  - Everyone's posting the Motherjones article though where it says he thinks all blacks belong in "slower" schools. -- nm* - Endor Dec 10, 14:42 24
    - "less-advanced school" "slower-track school" -- nm - jar jar trump Dec 10, 14:43 23
      - The problem is the unequivocal "blacks belong in" that Motherjones invented. -- nm - Endor Dec 10, 14:46 22
        
        I agree it's more nuanced than that. He's not, for instance, arguing that black students that get in on the top 10% test should go to slower schools. - pmb Dec 10, 14:54
        
        that's completely the inference of the argument. because they "can't" do as well at schools like UT, they only deserve to go to the lesser schools -- nm - jar jar trump Dec 10, 14:49 19
        
        Except that they're specifically talking about affirmative action and those who only get into a school because of it. - Endor Dec 10, 14:54 18
        
        That's really not how it works. It is a factor among many that is being considered. When you have a kid going through college admission you will - pmb Dec 10, 15:09 6
        
        Except that those being discussed wouldn't have gotten in with exactly the same qualifications if they were another race, right? -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:13 5
        
        The point is that there are no 2 students with exactly the same qualifications when you get past the 10% rule. The minority has a "point on his - pmb Dec 10, 15:21 2
        
        Do you believe "skin color" is a qualification for college? -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:23 1
        
        That's an absurd statement. Is being good at sports a "qualification". This is not about qualifications. They meet the "qualifications" for getting - pmb Dec 10, 15:27
        
        If "squishyness" were all it were then we could just drop the race question and go with everything else, right? -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:15 1
        
        You're missing the point that diversity is good for the campus as a whole. Just as the kid who started his own business in high school (even though - pmb Dec 10, 15:25
        
        Not "only". These are students that are qualified to be there, but the deciding factor to admit has a racial component. - TWuGbacca Dec 10, 15:06 4
        
        But less qualified than others, right? -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:08 3
        
        Maybe. Maybe just differently qualified. - TWuGbacca Dec 10, 15:17 1
        
        Are we seriously saying that the skin color your born with its a qualification for getting into college? -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:21
        
        See my post above. It is way more "squishy" than that. The vast majority of college admissions is not just academic formulation. -- nm - pmb Dec 10, 15:10
        
        that's not how the policy works -- nm - jar jar trump Dec 10, 14:58 5
        
        So there aren't people who get admitted over non-minority students with better scores? -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:06 4
        
        There are non-minorities that get admitted over other non-minorities with better scores. Scores are not the only criteria. -- nm - pmb Dec 10, 15:12
        
        With Texas' top 10% of each high school, yes. -- nm - toblr.2 Dec 10, 15:10 2
        
        So the non-top-10-percent is strictly merit based? That's just not true. -- nm - Ender Dec 10, 15:16 1
        
        didn't say anything on that, just answered the question. -- nm - toblr.2 Dec 10, 15:26
        
        I haven't seen that, but I have seen really selective quoting. and a lot of people who can't be bothered to check for context on their own. -- nm - b. Dec 10, 14:49

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.