Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 09:36
2: Dec 4, 02:38
3: Dec 3, 14:19
4: Dec 3, 11:17
5: Dec 3, 07:33
6: Dec 2, 17:22
7: Dec 2, 11:48
8: Dec 2, 08:21
9: Dec 1, 17:33
10: Dec 1, 11:23
11: Nov 30, 15:54
12: Nov 30, 09:41
13: Nov 29, 16:44
14: Nov 29, 08:01
15: Nov 28, 16:19
16: Nov 28, 09:42
17: Nov 27, 18:07
18: Nov 27, 12:04
19: Nov 27, 08:26
20: Nov 26, 18:06
Posts: 177
In response to
"
Study: Majority happy to lie about what he actually said. -- nm
"
by
Endor
here is the transcript -- (link)
Posted by
jar jar trump (aka chris)
Dec 10 '15, 14:37
(No message)
he doesn't agree with "those who contend" of course, he's just putting the argument out there
(twitter.com)
Responses:
Isn't the point of aff,action that students who might not score well because of their background that possibly held them back, so it's not that they
-
General Zeit
Dec 10, 15:19
Everyone's posting the Motherjones article though where it says he thinks all blacks belong in "slower" schools. -- nm*
-
Endor
Dec 10, 14:42
24
"less-advanced school" "slower-track school" -- nm
-
jar jar trump
Dec 10, 14:43
23
The problem is the unequivocal "blacks belong in" that Motherjones invented. -- nm
-
Endor
Dec 10, 14:46
22
I agree it's more nuanced than that. He's not, for instance, arguing that black students that get in on the top 10% test should go to slower schools.
-
pmb
Dec 10, 14:54
that's completely the inference of the argument. because they "can't" do as well at schools like UT, they only deserve to go to the lesser schools -- nm
-
jar jar trump
Dec 10, 14:49
19
Except that they're specifically talking about affirmative action and those who only get into a school because of it.
-
Endor
Dec 10, 14:54
18
That's really not how it works. It is a factor among many that is being considered. When you have a kid going through college admission you will
-
pmb
Dec 10, 15:09
6
Except that those being discussed wouldn't have gotten in with exactly the same qualifications if they were another race, right? -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:13
5
The point is that there are no 2 students with exactly the same qualifications when you get past the 10% rule. The minority has a "point on his
-
pmb
Dec 10, 15:21
2
Do you believe "skin color" is a qualification for college? -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:23
1
That's an absurd statement. Is being good at sports a "qualification". This is not about qualifications. They meet the "qualifications" for getting
-
pmb
Dec 10, 15:27
If "squishyness" were all it were then we could just drop the race question and go with everything else, right? -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:15
1
You're missing the point that diversity is good for the campus as a whole. Just as the kid who started his own business in high school (even though
-
pmb
Dec 10, 15:25
Not "only". These are students that are qualified to be there, but the deciding factor to admit has a racial component.
-
TWuGbacca
Dec 10, 15:06
4
But less qualified than others, right? -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:08
3
Maybe. Maybe just differently qualified.
-
TWuGbacca
Dec 10, 15:17
1
Are we seriously saying that the skin color your born with its a qualification for getting into college? -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:21
See my post above. It is way more "squishy" than that. The vast majority of college admissions is not just academic formulation. -- nm
-
pmb
Dec 10, 15:10
that's not how the policy works -- nm
-
jar jar trump
Dec 10, 14:58
5
So there aren't people who get admitted over non-minority students with better scores? -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:06
4
There are non-minorities that get admitted over other non-minorities with better scores. Scores are not the only criteria. -- nm
-
pmb
Dec 10, 15:12
With Texas' top 10% of each high school, yes. -- nm
-
toblr.2
Dec 10, 15:10
2
So the non-top-10-percent is strictly merit based? That's just not true. -- nm
-
Ender
Dec 10, 15:16
1
didn't say anything on that, just answered the question. -- nm
-
toblr.2
Dec 10, 15:26
I haven't seen that, but I have seen really selective quoting. and a lot of people who can't be bothered to check for context on their own. -- nm
-
b.
Dec 10, 14:49
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.