Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 153
In response to
"
not necessarily. congress can expressly preempt state laws if its law "covers the field." but it can leave areas of the law open to state regulation -- nm
"
by
pigby
never mind the whole "implied preemption" doctrine
Posted by
pigby (aka chris)
Apr 6 '09, 21:24
seriously, you don't want to try to figure out implied preemption
Responses:
*head explodes*
-
Krusty
Apr 6, 21:25
1
i don't know that they "trump" state laws. the feds and states each have CDS laws that may or may not overlap
-
pigby
Apr 6, 21:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.