Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 155
An interesting summary my coworker just mentioned to me about SW is that it's fast paced with little breathing time between the action.
Posted by
Max Rebo (aka Max)
Dec 21 '15, 09:53
I don't remember the prequels being slow, but that makes it sound different in style than the original trilogy pacing.
Responses:
The original Star Wars is lethargically paced (I think). -- nm
-
Dark Side Callisto
Dec 21, 09:56
It makes you appreciate what a genius job Marcia Lucas did cutting the first one -- nm
-
humbug
Dec 21, 09:56
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.