Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 168
In response to
"
that's crap
"
by
humbug
Yes. But does mere government recognition or registration turn commercial speech into government speech? -- nm
Posted by
ReluctantCynic (aka ReluctantCynic)
Dec 22 '15, 12:41
(No message)
Responses:
nah, the existence of the system doesn't preclude anyone from labeling their goods/services whatever they want to. they're just not entitled to use
-
humbug
Dec 22, 12:45
3
So someone with a common law trademark would be excluded from the federal courts? Or they are just not entitled to federal registration ...
-
ReluctantCynic
Dec 22, 12:49
2
sue under common law if you want but don't ask the feds to give you the heightened Lanham Act sword to wield against your competitors -- nm
-
humbug
Dec 22, 12:53
1
I can't go that far.
-
ReluctantCynic
Dec 22, 13:12
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.