In response to
"Right? It'll take about three episodes before you're back here with questions. I have so many questions and a few just for the ST lawyers as well. -- nm"
by
Krusty
|
I have a procedural question that I can't find an answer to anywhere. (spoiler)
Posted by
Krusty (aka Krustylu)
Dec 29 '15, 06:40
|
Why would the judge not allow the defense to argue that there could have been a third party that committed the crime? We are told that the judge won't allow it and see the prosecutor refer to that ruling when the defense tries to bring up something that would point to a third party possibly being involved.
I found this very confusing and it never gets explained.
|
|
Responses:
- [deleted]
2
|