ST Alpha - "would that make it the shortest tenure at #1 for the biggest grossing movie? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

In response to "No. Had STAR7 done over $100m last weekend I would have said Panda won't either, but now I expect it will. -- nm" by Max

would that make it the shortest tenure at #1 for the biggest grossing movie? -- nm

Posted by humbug (aka chris) Jan 6 '16, 10:42

(No message)

Responses:

Contrast that with Back to the Future, which was #1 for 12 weeks, top 5 for 20 weeks (non-consecutive for both, but close) -- nm - Max Jan 6, 10:50 4
- Beverly Hills Cop: #1 for 14 weeks, top 10 for 28 weeks -- nm - Max Jan 6, 10:53 3
  - in 1984, i thought nothing of just walking up to the 3-screen at the top of the hill and seeing a movie multiple times if it was good - humbug Jan 6, 10:58 2
    - I was so excited to see Return of the Jedi that I drank all my soda early and kept running to the bathroom, so we just stayed for the next showing - Max Jan 6, 11:00 1
      - my youngest brother was only 7 and cried like a BITCH when we walked out - humbug Jan 6, 11:08
Avatar dropped for its 8th weekend (Feb 5.), Jurassic World dropped in its 4th weekend (Inside Out bumped up, JW dropped 400+ theaters) -- nm - Max Jan 6, 10:46 1
- I look forward to Episode VIII breaking the domestic record in 2 weeks and then dropping to #2 for the third weekend. -- nm* - Spawn Solo Jan 6, 10:48
In the modern era, yeah. Titanic was 15 weeks? Avatar was like 7 or 8? - Will Hunting Jan 6, 10:45

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.