Backboards: 
Posts: 160

it seems an easy enough question for him to answer

in addition to being originalists, justices should be deferential to the will of Congress. :)

To your point, your question is a more substantive question of legal interpretation than a purely political point, not that it can't also be used as one, and that's okay.





Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.