ST Alpha - "Nah, it sucked but didn't lower the grade. It was a lack of real action in a monster movie where you barely see the monster." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "was it the shakycam? -- nm" by ML

Nah, it sucked but didn't lower the grade. It was a lack of real action in a monster movie where you barely see the monster.

Posted by Krusty (aka Krustylu) Jan 18 '16, 06:43

I was okay with the cam though I'm not sure anyone would be carrying a camera the entire time. I just wanted a bit more of the monster and more action. The action we did get was very good. I liked those little monsters but I thought we'd see them more as well.
It could have been much better.

Responses:

I liked the lack of monster visual. It added to the imagination. -- nm - JaxSean Jan 18, 06:51 3
- I get that and it for a while it was cool to not see it doing the damage but by the end I was left - Krusty Jan 18, 06:53
- yeah, that's me too (spoils) - ML Jan 18, 06:52 1
  - nm -- nm* - ML Jan 18, 07:05
you want a good monster movie? what the Korean film - The Host - that shit is nightmarish -- nm - Pippy Stardust Jan 18, 06:49 5
- Noted. Thanks! -- nm - Krusty Jan 18, 07:01
- REC -- nm - ML Jan 18, 06:51 3
  - The Happening -- nm - prayformojo Jan 18, 06:59 2
    - heh -- (link) - ML Jan 18, 07:05 [Image] 1
      - say hello to your mother for me -- nm - Pippy Stardust Jan 18, 07:09
Also, where did the monster come from? - Loyola Jan 18, 06:46 3
- that is definitively answered in the film (spoils) - ML Jan 18, 06:51 2
  - Though (spoils) - Roger More Jan 18, 08:09
  - Yup -- nm - amoxy Jan 18, 07:32

Post a message top

Nah, it sucked but didn't lower the grade. It was a lack of real action in a monster movie where you barely see the monster.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.