ST Alpha - "I don't think so. If that were the case, wouldn't every healthy woman deliberately contract it before trying to get pregnant? Maybe in their teens? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "i could google, but i bet one of you read it already - once you've had Zika, and got over it (seemingly quickly) are you immune going forward? -- nm" by Andie

I don't think so. If that were the case, wouldn't every healthy woman deliberately contract it before trying to get pregnant? Maybe in their teens? -- nm

Posted by mara Jan 28 '16, 10:46

(No message)

Responses:

Had anyone outside of disease research heard about it 5 years ago? It's not well known like chicken pox -- nm - Roger More Jan 28, 11:01
well, it's brand new right, so maybe that's where we go in future? (edit - apparently only new over here.) -- nm* - Andie Jan 28, 10:46 6
- This is interesting - Andie Jan 28, 10:48 5
  - A vaccine would certainly be a lot safer than exposure (which endangers everyone). -- nm - mara Jan 28, 10:52 4
    - well, yes? - Andie Jan 28, 10:55 3
      - several things, is it the virus or the antibody that causes birth defects, or once the virus settles in does it continue to do damage -- nm - zeitgeist Jan 28, 11:43 1
        
        The infection lasts mere days and it's the virus that causes the birth defects. -- nm - spamlet Jan 28, 11:47
      - Oh, no, I didn't mean to sound like was disagreeing with something. I'm the dope who suggested otherwise. :-) -- nm - mara Jan 28, 11:01
I mean, not that you can deliberately now; but wouldn't there be plans in place to do that? -- nm - mara Jan 28, 10:46

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.