Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 156
Realistically, will we have results by 11pm tonight or does the caucus system take longer to tabulate? (planning my sleep/schedule) -- nm*
Posted by
Max
Feb 1 '16, 13:15
(No message)
Responses:
news said 9pm Eastern for information to start -- nm
-
oblique
Feb 1, 13:17
I recall 'knowing' results last year, although they called GOP for Romney when it turned out to really be Santorum when they finished counting. -- nm
-
ty97
Feb 1, 13:17
5
in fairness that was the closest caucus result in history -- nm
-
ML
Feb 1, 13:17
3
understood, but the networks need to not be willing to call it in cases like that. -- nm
-
ty97
Feb 1, 13:21
2
what -- nm
-
Florida 2000
Feb 1, 13:22
1
well . . .
-
mr. plow
Feb 1, 13:22
(I mean, they were pretty much even, which is what makes calling a 'winner' of Iowa, a proportional delegate state, rather dumb)
-
ty97
Feb 1, 13:17
Jeff Probst flies in on helicopter and takes the voting pot away, to be read at the live results show in November -- nm
-
mr. plow
Feb 1, 13:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.