|
In response to
"David, that's why I asked. I think it's actually not a bad rank."
by
ML
|
For me, the top 25 all-time is something you can't even think about today until you've got three rings.
Posted by
David (aka David)
Feb 3 '16, 16:33
|
And you're the primary reason why. That's Wilt/Russell/Bird/Magic territory. Like, I'm not sure John Stockton or Karl Malone is one of the 25 best ever, and they've done so much more than Curry.
|
Responses:
-
If you top 25, you need 7-8 years of being one of the handful best players in the world
-
Will Hunting
Feb 3, 17:59
-
May not be able to call him the best player yet, but you can easily call him one of the (if not the) best shooters. -- nm
-
Spawn
Feb 3, 17:31
4
-
I mostly agree. I really do. But I'm also wary of not crediting enough how incredible he's been for a decently sustained period of time. -- (link)
-
ML
Feb 3, 16:38
1
-
Relatedly, I'd love to read Hyde's list of the top 25 NBA players ever at some point. -- nm
-
David
Feb 3, 16:37
4
-
Rings are overrated -- nm
-
Dan Marino
Feb 3, 16:35
-
ML is the reason for so many things, isn't he? -- nm
-
b.
Feb 3, 16:34
1
|