|
In response to
"You're sure about reading it before? Everything I'm reading says USA Today never published the 74 page court documents. Just the article. -- nm*"
by
Inigo
|
I am, yes.
Posted by
David's iPad (aka David)
Feb 13 '16, 13:19
|
Whether somebody published it locally or nationally, I can't say. But I've read all of it. The stories are ones I reference when I speak about the boys' network and general misogyny in the SEC.
Basically, this story is about something entirely different, but they're libeling Manning by vague association. He had problems with one woman, she had problems with everybody. I even referenced her last week in a different conversation. She's made a million bucks and counting from this nonsense.
This writer does a slam piece, and it reads that much worse to people who followed the story each time it arose. It annoys me when a "journalist" is this transparently shady with the truth.
Manning was in the wrong, but the punishment, at least as reported, stopped fitting the crime by the turn of the millennium.
|