Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 161
In response to
"
Saw that on facebook and then also immediately saw articles refuting it. Not sure it's 100% legit. -- nm
"
by
volnelk
FWIW NYT has the story. The context was that the Justice Committee was looking at changing the nomination procedures, after what happened in the Bork
Posted by
Roger More (aka rogermore)
Feb 23 '16, 04:25
and Thomas hearings. But politicians gonna politic.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/02/23/us/politics/joe-biden-argued-for-delaying-supreme-court-picks-in-1992.html
(mobile.nytimes.com)
Responses:
Also worth noting that he was looking prospectively from when he gave the speech in June of the election year. Not February. -- nm
-
pmb
Feb 23, 08:03
Context? Who needs that? -- nm
-
znufrii
Feb 23, 05:09
1
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.