ST Alpha - "This appears to be an attempt to test the limits of the recency effect. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "25 beats both. -- nm" by David

This appears to be an attempt to test the limits of the recency effect. -- nm

Posted by Roger More (aka rogermore) Feb 23 '16, 17:30

(No message)

Responses:

This is like the Bryan Cranston thing all over again. Don't you learn? - David Feb 23, 17:36 13
- That you disagree just to disagree? Sure I do! -- nm - Roger More Feb 23, 17:37 12
  - Good lord, man. You're like Spawn. - David Feb 23, 17:38 11
    - So far the split on this "more divisive question" is between you and everyone. -- nm - Roger More Feb 23, 17:45 10
      - one might even surmise he posted the question for the sole purpose of arguing his (wrong) point -- nm - ML Feb 23, 17:55 1
        
        Vermin leaving the board created a contrarian vacuum that had to be filled. -- nm - Roger More Feb 23, 18:02
      - so par for the course -- nm - sweet baboo Feb 23, 17:46
      - Your memory is even as bad as his. -- nm - David Feb 23, 17:46 6
        
        It's as though you're Homer drawing a line down the centre of the house, a la 'I Love Lucy' -- nm - Roger More Feb 23, 17:48 5
        
        I say this with tremendous love for my Brotherman, but when arguing with David on these things, the only way to win is not to play. nm - ralph wiggum Feb 23, 17:51 3
        
        Dude. -- nm - David Feb 23, 17:53 1
        
        You are STUBBORN!! Especially about the Simpsons. I refer you to Ralph the Viking as Exhibit A. nm - ralph wiggum Feb 23, 17:55
        
        "just don't look. just don't look"...nm - x Feb 23, 17:53
        
        Not your best 36 hours. -- nm - David Feb 23, 17:51

Post a message top

This appears to be an attempt to test the limits of the recency effect. -- nm

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.