ST Alpha - "Thanks. I guess that answers my question. The rule in 2013 was because they had those teams twice. But its an a-hole rule." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "Here's the rule:" by ML

Thanks. I guess that answers my question. The rule in 2013 was because they had those teams twice. But its an a-hole rule.

Posted by crash davis (aka trisha) Mar 23 '16, 12:18

Playoff teams getting to refuse seems like the rich get richer. Carroll had refused because he didn't want to expose any tiny part of their scheme to other teams ahead of time.

Responses:

I view it as motivation: succeed, or we'll foist HBO on you -- nm - ML Mar 23, 12:41 3
- Then why has it not been the Browns for the last several years? -- nm - Spawn Mar 23, 12:45 2
  - rule of no first-year head coaches is one big reason -- nm - ML Mar 23, 12:52 1
    - Ah, good point. -- nm - Spawn Mar 23, 12:59

Post a message top

Thanks. I guess that answers my question. The rule in 2013 was because they had those teams twice. But its an a-hole rule.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.