Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 153
In response to
"
if he isn't the future in SF, maybe they should pay the difference...a year on the bench wouldn't help his trade value -- nm
"
by
crash davis
It's about cap space rather than money. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Apr 4 '16, 09:56
(No message)
Responses:
How would that work out? I really haven't studied the cap space issue as well as you and a few others here. -- nm
-
crash davis
Apr 4, 10:02
3
As for me, I'd say "If we aren't playing him, lets save 7 million and get something. If his contract is up the following year, we'll get nothing" -- nm
-
crash davis
Apr 4, 10:04
2
No, it's the Denver side. They can't afford what Kaep costs. They have $1.6 million in space.
-
David
Apr 4, 10:06
1
oh, I thought it was an issue with the Niners. Thanks! -- nm
-
crash davis
Apr 4, 10:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
