ST Alpha - "He's been going negative for a bit now. And openly lamenting that he didn't go negative sooner. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "I guess the last veneer of civility in the Democratic primary is gone. -- (link)" by spamlet, spreading happiness and joy where he goes

He's been going negative for a bit now. And openly lamenting that he didn't go negative sooner. -- nm

Posted by ty97 Apr 7 '16, 05:52

(No message)

Responses:

So has she. She's getting frustrated at losing to him. -- nm - Krusty Apr 7, 05:52 20
- umm, she is still winning. I think she is more frustrated that he wants to keep dragging this out and therefore keeping the story about him vs her - Truman Apr 7, 05:54 4
  - He has won the last few primaries and is getting close to winning the next few as well. He's dragging it out because he can still win. -- nm - Krusty Apr 7, 05:58 3
    - Is it possible he could win? Yes. Is it in any way probable? No. - Inigo Apr 7, 06:16 2
      - It would require a significant shift in demographic voting patterns from the first half of the primaries - ty97 Apr 7, 06:24
      - This. Understanding delegate math is quite simple. -- nm - MDH Apr 7, 06:22
- (She's winning) -- nm - ty97 Apr 7, 05:53 14
  - Really? *checks the last six primaries* Bernie has the momentum and has been winning of late. - Krusty Apr 7, 05:57 13
    - bernie's base delegate goal for WI was 48. He's so far behind he needs to exceed his goals every time. His total delegates from WI 48. - MDH Apr 7, 06:29 2
      - Momentum builds momentum. She's going to win and thanks to the joke that is the GOP, she's going to win. -- nm - Will Hunting Apr 7, 06:31
      - Case in point, to meet (not even exceed his goal), he needs to win NY 51-49. -- nm - MDH Apr 7, 06:30
    - His negativity is not in response, he's been negative for a while. - ty97 Apr 7, 05:59 9
      - If this is going negative we've really gotten soft. -- nm - Krusty Apr 7, 06:01 8
        
        I don't know, saying that the other person isn't qualified to be President is a pretty negative statement. - spamlet, spreading happiness and joy where he goes Apr 7, 06:08 2
        
        Objectively, yes. In the context of political discourse, no. -- nm - znufrii Apr 7, 06:24
        
        Please. Every candidate that has ever run has said their opponent isn't qualified. This is barely anything. -- nm - Krusty Apr 7, 06:11
        
        It's certainly nowhere near the negativity of the other race, for sure. -- nm - ty97 Apr 7, 06:02 3
        
        Forget the other race, it's not near any race ever. If he says anything critical it's an attack or going negative. - Krusty Apr 7, 06:05 2
        
        I guess I'm confused then - ty97 Apr 7, 06:07 1
        
        Fair enough. They're both going negative in a very soft way and with a bit of truth behind it. -- nm - Krusty Apr 7, 06:10
        
        This -- nm - znufrii Apr 7, 06:02

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.