Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 09:36
2: Dec 4, 02:38
3: Dec 3, 14:19
4: Dec 3, 11:17
5: Dec 3, 07:33
6: Dec 2, 17:22
7: Dec 2, 11:48
8: Dec 2, 08:21
9: Dec 1, 17:33
10: Dec 1, 11:23
11: Nov 30, 15:54
12: Nov 30, 09:41
13: Nov 29, 16:44
14: Nov 29, 08:01
15: Nov 28, 16:19
16: Nov 28, 09:42
17: Nov 27, 18:07
18: Nov 27, 12:04
19: Nov 27, 08:26
20: Nov 26, 18:06
Posts: 157
In response to
"
TK, Disney wants to have a channel that ages with its viewers.
"
by
David
OK, that makes sense.....though removing the Disney name, and giving it a pretty generic name with no inferred ties to Disney
Posted by
prayformojo (aka mayhem)
Apr 7 '16, 16:49
costs them a lot of name recognition.
Responses:
I presume that the thinking in the boardroom is...
-
David
Apr 7, 17:05
5
yeah, that was a big risky leap to take -- nm
-
prayformojo
Apr 7, 17:07
4
Do you think it's the smart move or a foolish disavowal of the brand?
-
David
Apr 7, 17:14
3
given the # of channels, they should have setup a new on and called it Freeform and used the original to keep the viewers coming from a young age -- nm
-
Beaker
Apr 7, 17:41
2
They'd have to double their programming for that then decide what goes where. It's the FXX fiasco. -- nm
-
David
Apr 7, 18:06
1
true, but it is Disney, they can snap their fingers and get 10 new shows :) -- nm
-
Beaker
Apr 7, 18:14
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.