Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 153
In response to
"
Because body armor sales are well regulated. -- nm
"
by
TWuG
If so it seems a flag should have went up, then. -- nm
Posted by
Spawn
Jun 13 '16, 08:56
(No message)
Responses:
Sales are more "demonstrate a need" than "pass a background check". I dont think sales need to be reported, just
-
TWuG
Jun 13, 09:00
Should have, but more than likely, the systems don't talk to each other
-
Will Hunting
Jun 13, 08:59
3
Agreed, but a dude trying to buy class 3 body armor is declined, I would think there is a reason* and that reason should cause something.
-
Spawn
Jun 13, 09:01
2
I remember when my job had to purchase some body armor...that was among the most interesting purchases I ever did.
-
Will Hunting
Jun 13, 09:06
Your IM is probably it. He lacked the law enforcement or military credentials to be able to make the purchase -- nm
-
TWuG
Jun 13, 09:02
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.