ST Alpha - "Sure. I could agree with this. Best record, best team stats, champions. But it comes with a caveat." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 170

In response to "So if/when the Warriors lock down the championship, are they the best single season team ever? -- (edited)" by Shaun

Sure. I could agree with this. Best record, best team stats, champions. But it comes with a caveat.

Posted by ReluctantCynic (aka ReluctantCynic) Jun 13 '16, 16:10

Are they a dynasty team? Or are they a one-hit wonder?

Also, there is a huge difference between "best (or one of the best) teams of all time" versus "best single-season team ever."

Responses:

it'd be more than one hit, they did go all the way last season. -- nm - b. Jun 13, 16:16 7
- Good point. I was just trying to draw a distinction between "best teams for a season or two" and "best teams of all times." - ReluctantCynic Jun 13, 16:24 6
  - heh, I'm ok with saying what I said, obviously; but reading your im made me a little reflexively vexed. "can't they win and be laud- - b. Jun 13, 16:30
  - The Shaq/Kobe Lakers arguably weren't as good as the Kareem/Magic Lakers. -- nm - jnine Jun 13, 16:29 4
    - i'm comfortable saying the shaq/kobe lakers were certainly not as good as the magic/kareem lakers....nm - x Jun 13, 16:39 1
      - They were fortunate to get 3. Al time collapse by Portland and an all-time fishy referee-game vs Sacramento. - Will Hunting Jun 13, 16:46
    - I can agree with that, too. And there's an argument that even the Kareem/Magic years weren't the best Lakers teams of all time. - ReluctantCynic Jun 13, 16:35 1
      - Wilt/Jerry/Elgin agree. -- nm - jnine Jun 13, 16:43

Post a message top

Sure. I could agree with this. Best record, best team stats, champions. But it comes with a caveat.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.