In response to
"In a better era of basketball, they were still dominant. That matters. -- nm"
by
David
|
while i'm not at all convinced that era was so much better than now, another reason that i think the 91-92 team was likely better was because....
Posted by
x (aka dmuck)
Jun 13 '16, 16:33
|
95-96 was an expansion year, which no doubt watered down the league. that's one thing that i think is a big point in favor of the 85-86 celts and the 86-87 lakers in these discussions is that there were a lot fewer teams. those two teams were bringing people like bill walton and mychal thompson off their benches, which is insane.
|
Responses:
|