Backboards: 
Posts: 170
In response to "In a better era of basketball, they were still dominant. That matters. -- nm" by David

while i'm not at all convinced that era was so much better than now, another reason that i think the 91-92 team was likely better was because....

95-96 was an expansion year, which no doubt watered down the league. that's one thing that i think is a big point in favor of the 85-86 celts and the 86-87 lakers in these discussions is that there were a lot fewer teams. those two teams were bringing people like bill walton and mychal thompson off their benches, which is insane.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.