Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 155
SCOTUS: Could the Senate wait to see how the election turns out and then confirm Garland in the lame duck session?
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Jun 20 '16, 06:09
That way they'd know for sure if Garland is the likely best option for them.
Responses:
would Obama keep him up there so that he'd get one more, or pull him and let Hillary do it? -- nm
-
mafic
Jun 20, 06:11
1
I think he pulls him back and lets Hillary nominate someone. He doesn't need it to secure his legacy so it might be
-
Krusty
Jun 20, 06:13
They can try but Obama can pull him back. -- nm
-
Krusty
Jun 20, 06:11
4
[deleted]
3
Obama pulls him and then Hillary nominates Obama. -- nm
-
mara
Jun 20, 07:24
1
[deleted]
I posted something similar just above. I don't think he needs it and would be happy to see -- (edited)
-
Krusty
Jun 20, 06:14
Theoretically, but there's nothing to stop Obama from withdrawing the nomination before they do. -- nm
-
znufrii, dad.
Jun 20, 06:10
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
