Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 5, 07:07
2: Dec 4, 18:10
3: Dec 4, 12:27
4: Dec 4, 09:36
5: Dec 4, 02:38
6: Dec 3, 14:19
7: Dec 3, 11:17
8: Dec 3, 07:33
9: Dec 2, 17:22
10: Dec 2, 11:48
11: Dec 2, 08:21
12: Dec 1, 17:33
13: Dec 1, 11:23
14: Nov 30, 15:54
15: Nov 30, 09:41
16: Nov 29, 16:44
17: Nov 29, 08:01
18: Nov 28, 16:19
19: Nov 28, 09:42
20: Nov 27, 18:07
Posts: 159
In response to
"
I seem to remember it used to be at current price at one point to stop people from profiting but it's consistent with "normal" delists.
"
by
spamlet
It does seem to me if a person still has movies coming out they shouldn't delist until the adjusts are finished.
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Jun 20 '16, 15:40
There's really no reason to.
Responses:
Originally the star bonds (when they were bonds) were meant to signal an actors ability to pull audiences to a film.
-
iSpam
Jun 20, 16:26
1
if the idea to prevent speculation cashing in on a death, then delist at current price prevents day traders from shorting/reversing
-
zeitgeist
Jun 20, 18:21
that's always made sense to me. their work lives beyond them. -- nm
-
b.
Jun 20, 15:42
That's what I wasn't sure of. Maybe if the movie's already released they wait for the adjust? -- nm
-
Meg
Jun 20, 15:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.