ST Alpha - "That's great for money but not for celebrity. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 179

In response to "O'Reilly and Hannity both have syndicated radio. Not sure about Susteren. -- nm" by ÜMLaut

That's great for money but not for celebrity. -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Jul 19 '16, 12:39

(No message)

Responses:

Eh. Those two are at the point where they're self-sustaining. I forgot that both have substantial book sales/exposure as well. -- nm* - ÜMLaut Jul 19, 12:41 11
- There's just no upside for them to leave Fox News. It takes away too much of their audience. -- nm - David Jul 19, 12:45 10
  - This was 2014, but Hannity had 13 million radio listeners. -- (link) - spamlet Jul 19, 12:51 7
    - So? It's TV that's power. -- nm - David Jul 19, 12:52 6
      - At maybe 1/20th of the audience? Unlikely. -- nm - spamlet Jul 19, 12:54 5
        
        You're bad at this. Stop being bad at this. -- nm - David Jul 19, 12:55 4
        
        You argued it would take away too much of the audience even though their radio audience is a double digit multiple of TV. - spamlet Jul 19, 12:58 3
        
        Literally the first thing I mentioned was the radio money. Do you even know what you're arguing? -- nm - David Jul 19, 13:05 2
        
        That they won't lose that much sway by being off tv. -- (edited) - iSpam Jul 19, 13:14 1
        
        O'Reilly makes $15 million a year plus incentives on tv. - David Jul 19, 13:18
  - they'd certainly make news if CNN signed them. -- nm - Remlik Jul 19, 12:49 1
    - And CNN would lose the middle. -- nm - David Jul 19, 12:50

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.