ST Alpha - "Lucroy still has to approve the deal so it's not done yet -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Whew, the Mets should not be buyers and had a lot on the table for Lucroy supposedly. -- nm" by Tim

Lucroy still has to approve the deal so it's not done yet -- nm

Posted by iSpam (aka spamlet) Jul 31 '16, 07:07

(No message)

Responses:

Lucroy vetoes a trade that would have sent him to the Cleveland Indians. -- (link) - budice Jul 31, 08:17
Ooh, he's apparently said no. -- nm - Tim Jul 31, 08:04 5
- If I was a GM that needed a catcher I'd wonder though. He's apparently okay with staying in Milwaukee that's going to do nothing but lose for years. - iSpam Jul 31, 09:55
- Oof. Do they have anyone worthwhile? We'll trade McCann. -- nm - Krusty Jul 31, 08:10 3
  - He also has a no-trade clause. -- nm - Krusty Jul 31, 08:14 2
    - Yeah, Cleveland was one of the places on his no trade list. - Tim Jul 31, 08:16 1
      - You'd only have to live there for like seven months out of the year. :-) - Krusty Jul 31, 08:22

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.