Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 153
now, I've come across some weird fetishes in my life, but the one which inspired the law at hand here is just, ugh. -- (link)
Posted by
znufrii
Apr 21 '09, 10:17
(No message)
SCOTUS to hear First Amendment case involving depictions of cruelty to animals.
(www.nytimes.com)
Responses:
[deleted]
4
Yeah I think Judge D. Brooks Smith got it right. -- nm
-
Qale
Apr 21, 10:29
2
[deleted]
1
When I first say the link description I thought it was going to be related to furry porn. Which alas, should also be protected by 1st Amend. -- nm
-
Qale
Apr 21, 10:34
as distasteful as it is, you're probably right. -- nm
-
znufrii
Apr 21, 10:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.