ST Alpha - "no one gives a shit about running time if the movie is good. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 169

In response to "The running time as released was already 2 hours 10 minutes." by Spawn

no one gives a shit about running time if the movie is good. -- nm

Posted by groiny (aka groiny) Aug 10 '16, 08:53

(No message)

Responses:

Well then, all DC movies should probably be 90 minutes then. -- nm - Ender Aug 10, 09:03 1
- I could have edited BvS down easily by 25 minutes, and that would have still included some of the deleted shit that needed to be in there. -- nm - groiny Aug 10, 09:04
Yes they do. There's zero need for a 3 hour superhero movie when you're gonna have 19 sequels anyway. -- nm - iSpam Aug 10, 09:01 1
- 2 hours and 20 minutes is standard. (Avengers 1 and 2, Civil War was a bit longer) - groiny Aug 10, 09:03
Dude. You just lost your own arguement! -- nm - Spawn Aug 10, 08:57 8
- and the director should have much more input in the editing process as well. -- nm - groiny Aug 10, 09:01 3
  - They do, until management discovers they're making a movie nobody wants. -- nm - Ender Aug 10, 09:05 2
    - This movie was edited by a company that makes the trailers. - groiny Aug 10, 09:07 1
      - Yes, because Ayers was making a somber movie that nobody wanted this movie to be. -- nm - Ender Aug 10, 09:10
- give me a break, Civil War was damn near 3 hours. -- nm - groiny Aug 10, 08:57 3
  - (the movie was not good, and therefore, it should not be long) - Spawn Aug 10, 09:04 2
    - we have no idea what the movie would have been if WB had left it alone. - groiny Aug 10, 09:05 1
      - Oh, don't worry, I'm 100% sure I would have disliked it more if they had included more crappy Joker. -- nm - Ender Aug 10, 09:08

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.