Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 180
In response to
"
he's dating jenny mccarthy, whose son is autistic
"
by
prayformojo
Not everyone with an autistic child is nuts though. I'd guess that most arent'. -- nm
Posted by
Don Homer (aka DonHomer)
Apr 22 '09, 10:52
(No message)
Responses:
I'm nuts for thinking there may be smoke to this fire? -- nm
-
David
Apr 22, 10:59
9
I'm not sure what you're saying. What fire? -- nm
-
Don Homer
Apr 22, 10:59
8
With the limited number of studies done I think it's foolish to say that there's no way that there could possibly be any causation. -- nm
-
Stephen
Apr 22, 11:02
7
Also: eating carrots may cause blindness. (Where's the fire?) -- nm
-
Don Homer
Apr 22, 11:04
1
If you held a child who can't communicate at 3 but could at 2, you'd see the smoke.
-
David
Apr 22, 11:07
disagree, the studies are pretty good. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 22, 11:03
4
Studies done by whom?
-
Stephen
Apr 22, 11:06
1
NIH, CDC, etc. the studies are good. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 22, 11:10
I disagree with your disagreement. The studies thus far are limited and seem specifically intended to quell doubt.
-
David
Apr 22, 11:05
1
And there's never been afaik a cumulative study.
-
Stephen
Apr 22, 11:08
I can understand the desire for an explanation that drives a lot of this, though
-
znufrii
Apr 22, 10:54
6
yes, and IMO it ultimately damages what's supposed to be their cause. They're wasting time on a failed theory. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 22, 10:55
5
especially when there are plenty of other potential causalities out there to be explored. -- nm
-
znufrii
Apr 22, 10:59
4
exactly. they're hurting the cause. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 22, 11:00
3
on the whole, this Carrey piece is one of the saner, more level-headed addressings of the topic I've seen from their perspective, to be fair.
-
znufrii
Apr 22, 11:03
2
the fatal flaw of their movement is fixating on one answer. it's bad, bad science to do that. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 22, 11:04
1
agreed. -- nm
-
znufrii
Apr 22, 11:05
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.