Backboards: 
Posts: 163
In response to "for David and Stephen: The study that's *not* good is the one study that showed a possible link. That one study was fraudulent. -- nm" by loosilu

As we discussed at that point, none of this will be settled for years.

You agreed upon this point. Now, you seem to be saying that it's a slam dunk that this isn't true. I dispute this assessment and continue my previous assertion that we're all in wait and see mode on this. Deriding those who have the audacity to wonder why their children were better at communication before a vaccine is loathsome to me.

I'm going to bite my tongue beyond that other than to say once again that this conversation affects several people here. Tread carefully in your attempts to show that vaccine creators could never possibly make a mistake like that.


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.