Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 163
In response to
"
I have no idea. Are you saying that no study in history that has ever appeared in a major peer reviewed journal has been proen to be false? -- nm
"
by
Loyola
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I think loosi's point is that appearing in a major peer-reviewed journal adds a large amount of credibility to a study
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Apr 22 '09, 11:20
I agree with her.
Responses:
Peer review is not the be-all/end-all it is often touted as, but it does help. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 22, 11:21
3
It helps a great deal, but it's not perfect. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Apr 22, 11:22
it makes it a lot harder to poke holes in the reserach. -- nm
-
loosilu
Apr 22, 11:22
1
So we agree, then. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Apr 22, 11:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.