ST Alpha - "And a purpose of that brand was to protect her privacy. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "I think my views are hypocritical. I side with celebrities and anti-pap laws. Hulk Hogan may be scum but he deserved that win." by Max

And a purpose of that brand was to protect her privacy. -- nm

Posted by . (aka liioulu) Oct 3 '16, 13:52

(No message)

Responses:

If you're in witness protection hiding and want to draw out your potential killer, by all means release a video of yourself on the internet (B99) - Max Oct 3, 13:54 9
- If she's always written under that alias your argument doesn't hold water. -- nm - . Oct 3, 13:58 8
  - It's the "I sought privacy by drawing attention to myself" argument that doesn't hold water. - Max Oct 3, 14:03 7
    - And would you put the whole truth in a fake bio if you wanted to remain to remain private? -- nm - . Oct 3, 14:21 2
      - no, I *would not create a bio* if I wanted to remain private. -- nm - Max Oct 3, 14:27 1
        
        In all probability the publisher did it because it's expected and not having one would be more of note. -- nm - . Oct 3, 14:38
    - Is there a link to that interview? -- nm - . Oct 3, 14:14 2
      - It was on BBC radio, played over WAMU.org this morning - see if they have an archive. -- (link) - Max Oct 3, 14:18 1
        
        this partially , the journo reasoning does him no favors.. -- (link) - . Oct 3, 14:29
    - Then by your reasoning maybe she wanted an excuse to retire from writing. -- nm - . Oct 3, 14:10

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.