Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 152
In response to
"
LA Times goin' all in on their poll, huh? Trump +6, 42% female support, 42% hispanic support -- nm
"
by
Reagen
Unless women are turning out at record lows, it seems unlikely he could win with only 42% of women.
Posted by
TWuG
Nov 6 '16, 07:24
And there's no way he is getting 42% of the Hispanic vote
Responses:
Bill Mitchell, the anti-Nate Silver, is also going a bit off on Twitter. -- nm
-
Reagen
Nov 6, 07:29
1
He seems fun. -- nm
-
TWuG
Nov 6, 07:34
[deleted]
4
He'd need to win men by 65-70% and that just isn't reflect in any data. -- nm
-
TWuG
Nov 6, 07:31
3
The female number isn't *that* far out of whack but is off from most polling
-
Reagen
Nov 6, 07:35
1
[deleted]
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.