Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 155
In response to
"
oh pffft, rigged how? -- nm
"
by
crash davis
you're right, Wasserman-Schultz was forced to step down for no reason whatsoever -- nm
Posted by
ML (aka Iadodger)
Nov 8 '16, 18:21
(No message)
Responses:
Lol. -- nm
-
znufrii
Nov 8, 18:23
she was negative about an independent trying to take over the party, but no real rigging as far as I can see -- nm
-
crash davis
Nov 8, 18:22
5
I will kindly suggest that you take a look back (edit: here's the WaPo link) -- (edited)
-
ML
Nov 8, 18:25
4
that report has a lot of implied shit, but nothing, absolutely nothing in the way of a rigging campaign mentioned
-
crash davis
Nov 8, 18:31
3
OK™ -- nm
-
ML
Nov 8, 18:33
2
seriously, a lot of innuendo, but nothing that constitutes proof -- nm
-
crash davis
Nov 8, 18:40
1
crash, the emails referenced--thousands of them--are the proof
-
ML
Nov 8, 18:43
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
