Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 30, 15:54
2: Nov 30, 09:41
3: Nov 29, 16:44
4: Nov 29, 08:01
5: Nov 28, 16:19
6: Nov 28, 09:42
7: Nov 27, 18:07
8: Nov 27, 12:04
9: Nov 27, 08:26
10: Nov 26, 18:06
11: Nov 26, 12:05
12: Nov 26, 08:29
13: Nov 25, 18:33
14: Nov 25, 11:12
15: Nov 25, 07:08
16: Nov 24, 13:17
17: Nov 23, 18:13
18: Nov 23, 06:17
19: Nov 22, 13:24
20: Nov 22, 09:09
Posts: 157
In response to
"
I'll reiterate a position I've always held. The Electoral College is a relic of the past. We should go to a popular vote presidency. -- nm
"
by
crash davis
are the EC votes divided up by population -- nm
Posted by
Karl_S
Nov 8 '16, 19:22
(No message)
Responses:
no, its winner take all. So candidate A can lose a big state 50.1 to 49.9 and win a smaller 73 to 27 and thus lose even though they were ahead
-
crash davis
Nov 8, 19:24
Related to, but not the be-all and end-all -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 8, 19:24
It's winner take all per state based on how many Reps and Senators they have
-
Will Hunting
Nov 8, 19:24
sort of - each state gets 2 plus its number of seats in Congress
-
Reagen
Nov 8, 19:24
1
So, house and Senate combined -- nm
-
zork
Nov 8, 19:28
Only in that they follow House and Senate allocations. Senate isn't population based. -- nm
-
TWuG
Nov 8, 19:23
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
