Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 13, 12:54
2: Dec 13, 08:30
3: Dec 13, 05:28
4: Dec 12, 13:06
5: Dec 12, 08:55
6: Dec 11, 23:59
7: Dec 11, 14:43
8: Dec 11, 11:29
9: Dec 11, 07:59
10: Dec 10, 18:15
11: Dec 10, 12:28
12: Dec 10, 09:30
13: Dec 10, 05:59
14: Dec 9, 17:07
15: Dec 9, 13:47
16: Dec 9, 10:33
17: Dec 9, 07:33
18: Dec 8, 17:50
19: Dec 8, 10:32
20: Dec 8, 06:23
Posts: 158
In response to
"
That's reading the worst into the motivation, IMO. Science is developed through open discussion of ideas and evidence, so it should be no surprise
"
by
Roger More
*shrug* They may not like the title, but they are bureaucrats when they are one of the 39,000 gov't scientists. Bureaucrats don't speak on policy. -- nm
Posted by
Name Withheld by Request (aka BlueKopo)
Nov 23 '16, 08:49
(No message)
Responses:
Scientific research might (or might not) support policy decisions, but it's not policy. -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 23, 08:57
2
No, but commenting on the why particular research is or isn't useful can be policy decisions.
-
Name Withheld by Request
Nov 23, 09:01
1
A) That's not helpful in knowing what interviews etc did not happen, and why. B) Same rules + different people = different practices. -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 23, 09:09
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.