Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 157
In response to
"
non obstante veredicto (I learned something today thanks to you, so thanks!) -- (link)
"
by
ty97
Excellent! Now remind me, what does "post hoc ergo propter hoc" mean? -- nm
Posted by
ReluctantCynic (aka ReluctantCynic)
Dec 2 '16, 15:13
(No message)
Responses:
after this, therefore resulting from it: used to indicate that a causal relationship has erroneously been assumed from a merely sequential one. -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 2, 15:14
5
JackDawson and I are gonna make a lawyer out of you yet. -- nm
-
ReluctantCynic
Dec 2, 15:17
4
I am picturing Goofy in a Disney cartoon with a little devil image of himself on one shoulder and angel on the other, wondering what to do :)) -- nm
-
Peglegpete
Dec 2, 15:21
As long as I don't have to any reading or writing, I'm sold! -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 2, 15:20
2
(I did think pretty heavily about it maybe 10-12 years ago, but I'm an awful writer) -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 2, 15:21
1
Well, so is Jack Dawson ...
-
ReluctantCynic
Dec 2, 15:43
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
