Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 156
In response to
"
I completely disagree with this sentiment
"
by
Strongbad
OK good. But we're talking about the people who are trying to silence, intimidate or minimize those voices. -- nm
Posted by
Reagen
Jan 10 '17, 07:44
(No message)
Responses:
Call it splitting hairs if you want, I don't care.
-
Strongbad
Jan 10, 07:48
7
You've address "silenced", now address "minimize" and "intimidate", because that is also what is happening.
-
TWuG
Jan 10, 07:53
3
I agree.
-
Strongbad
Jan 10, 07:58
And, doesn't it all mean the same thing ? "Shut up."? -- nm
-
Andie
Jan 10, 07:54
1
It does. But is hardly surprising from a party that has eschewed evidence and fact for decades.
-
TWuG
Jan 10, 07:59
It's a distinction without a difference. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 10, 07:50
It's basically the definition of an ad hominem attack - dismissing the message because of who says it. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 10, 07:50
1
Yes. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Jan 10, 07:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.