my 2 cents: i am only tangentially following this stuff until it rolls out in more detail, but i gotta say....
Posted by
x (aka dmuck)
Jan 10 '17, 18:17
|
i am totally uncomfortable with the idea that the salacious sex stuff is what seems to be leading the moral outrage everywhere i can see. personally, i don't really care what sort of thing people get into in private as long as it's consensual. i'm much more concerned about things that matter in the public sphere.
|
Responses:
-
yes -- (link)
-
Spawn
Jan 10, 18:47
1
-
Forgive me, but substance has meant nothing in this election cycle, more than ever (and it's meant little for a long time).
-
Mop
Jan 10, 18:44
7
-
It doesn't really even sound sex-related, per se. He's just a bed wetter - at an Olympic level. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jan 10, 18:28
2
-
I 100% agree but this is funnier. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jan 10, 18:28
-
I find the sex stuff funny (aside from the whole exploitative aspect of prostitution), the rest of it is much more concerning.
-
mafic
Jan 10, 18:20
3
-
I'm fine with whatever it takes. Elliot Ness used tax evasion to get Capone forcryinoutloud -- nm
-
mud
Jan 10, 18:19
|