Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 159
For those keeping track, the new Nintendo Switch costs the same today as the old Nintendo Wii U--which never received a price cut. Ever. -- nm*
Posted by
ML (aka Iadodger)
Jan 13 '17, 06:28
(No message)
Responses:
Economies of scale. They never sold out their initial stock. So, they never had enough made to bring the price of making WiiUs down. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jan 13, 06:34
3
If the Switch doesn't work out, Nintendo would be best served by getting out of the hardware business completely.
-
ML
Jan 13, 06:37
2
Nintendo should go third party? Someone should alert them of this groundbreaking, brand new idea. ;) -- (edited)
-
Inigo
Jan 13, 06:45
a bidding wart for a Mario game between PS4 and XBox1 could be epic. same for a Zelda -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 13, 06:38
Wasn't the WiiU always $300? -- nm
-
MDH
Jan 13, 06:30
1
It was $300 for the base model. $350 for the larger storage and Nintendoland packed in. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jan 13, 06:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.