Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 11:29
2: Dec 11, 07:59
3: Dec 10, 18:15
4: Dec 10, 12:28
5: Dec 10, 09:30
6: Dec 10, 05:59
7: Dec 9, 17:07
8: Dec 9, 13:47
9: Dec 9, 10:33
10: Dec 9, 07:33
11: Dec 8, 17:50
12: Dec 8, 10:32
13: Dec 8, 06:23
14: Dec 7, 16:52
15: Dec 7, 07:17
16: Dec 6, 14:40
17: Dec 6, 10:07
18: Dec 6, 07:32
19: Dec 5, 19:48
20: Dec 5, 12:51
Posts: 157
In response to
"
Crazy concept. What happens if driverless cars cause a drought of organ donation?
"
by
Volnelk
35k deaths save how many people? And let's say they are all donors. -- nm
Posted by
CQ (aka CQ)
Jan 13 '17, 16:55
(No message)
Responses:
1/5th of donors come from car accidents. So it costs 35k deaths to save 7k lives. Seems legit -- nm
-
CQ
Jan 13, 16:58
3
One organ donor can save 8 lives and improve the lives of up to 50 people.
-
Beryllium
Jan 13, 18:23
I'm not so sure about that math, but I'll roll with it -- nm
-
crash davis
Jan 13, 17:32
Let's get rid of that seat belt law too! More parts for the rest of us! -- nm
-
CQ
Jan 13, 17:01
It's not just about saving them. There are non-terminal donations as well. Corneas, etc. -- (edited)
-
Beryllium
Jan 13, 16:57
1
I get the concept, but it's clinically inhumane. -- nm
-
CQ
Jan 13, 17:04
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
