Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 153
In response to
"
possibly slightly irrational level of irritation - a local restaurant is adding a 3% "employer mandates" charge - for a city that doesn't have that.
"
by
b.
call the manager tell him to remove the 3% or your people will not eat there. -- nm*
Posted by
Peglegpete (aka Peglegpete)
Jan 17 '17, 15:31
(No message)
Responses:
Yup. I'd take my business elsewhere and let them know why. -- nm
-
Krusty
Jan 17, 15:37
1
yup -- nm
-
Beaker
Jan 17, 18:09
I might if it was a larger group. really, I know it's not that big a thing - see, also, "slightly irrational." ;) -
-
b.
Jan 17, 15:37
8
google tells me this kind of thing is increasingly common at foodie-type places around the country. some people have nicknamed it "cheap employer
-
b.
Jan 17, 15:44
7
I'd be down if I thought that 3% was going toward the workers--it's just another way for them to pad their profits -- nm
-
Flavorize
Jan 17, 16:11
Hipster tax? I support it! -- nm
-
Baron Zero C
Jan 17, 16:02
I figured. And it strikes me as a more of a political statement than anything because of that.
-
pmb
Jan 17, 15:49
4
for the city I'm talking about had a modest raise recentishly but more are ahead in the next few years. I wonder how far the restaurant will go with
-
b.
Jan 17, 16:16
3
It would make me go elsewhere. The other part of it is that it's almost fraudulent in the sense that it implies that they are required to collect
-
pmb
Jan 17, 16:35
1
I feel similarly, obviously. I passed along my feelings to the person I helped, and there wasn't concern. my part is done... -- (edited)
-
b.
Jan 17, 17:01
make sure the city knows they are charging the 3%. the owners may not be declaring it correctly if at all on thier taxes -- nm
-
Peglegpete
Jan 17, 16:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.