ST Alpha - "some of the poll aggregator/model people did. HuffPo I think. NY Times had her at 94 or 95%. -- (edited)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "what are you taking about? i don't remember anyone saying he had a 99% chance of losing the election. what is your source for that?" by x

some of the poll aggregator/model people did. HuffPo I think. NY Times had her at 94 or 95%. -- (edited)

Posted by ty97 Jan 21 '17, 15:58

Nate wrote an article scolding their percentages right before the election

Responses:

Even Princeton Election Consortium had her at 98-99%. Here they are defending it on November 6. -- (link) - ty97 Jan 21, 16:03 4
- Nate of 538 and Ryan Grim of HuffPo twitter warring about the topic in early November -- (link) - ty97 Jan 21, 16:04 3
  - Heh, okay. I guess it was HuffPo. -- nm* - David, ST's Ultimate Lover Jan 21, 16:07 2
    - this is all fair enough. i sure don't pay any attention to huffpo....nm - x Jan 21, 16:12 1
      - The important thing is that it was the bad timing hall of fame. - David, ST's Ultimate Lover Jan 21, 16:16
I'm trying to find the piece I read on election day (or the day before) scolding 538/Nate Silver for being too gloomy... - Cuzzin Todd Jan 21, 16:01 1
- That's the one I referenced below. I don't remember who it was, either. -- nm - David, ST's Ultimate Lover Jan 21, 16:06

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.