In response to
"That's probability models, not polling, and anyone who went with 99% was bonkers. -- (edited)"
by
ty97
|
Nate Silver got slammed by an analyst at some site like HuffPo (but not them). His research indicated 99%.
|
He hit Silver two days prior to the election, and Silver hit back, arguing that 99% was ridiculous.
Basically, what happened was that polling data fundamentally changed after Comey's (second) announcement.
|
Responses:
|