Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 11:29
2: Dec 11, 07:59
3: Dec 10, 18:15
4: Dec 10, 12:28
5: Dec 10, 09:30
6: Dec 10, 05:59
7: Dec 9, 17:07
8: Dec 9, 13:47
9: Dec 9, 10:33
10: Dec 9, 07:33
11: Dec 8, 17:50
12: Dec 8, 10:32
13: Dec 8, 06:23
14: Dec 7, 16:52
15: Dec 7, 07:17
16: Dec 6, 14:40
17: Dec 6, 10:07
18: Dec 6, 07:32
19: Dec 5, 19:48
20: Dec 5, 12:51
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Nate Silver got slammed by an analyst at some site like HuffPo (but not them). His research indicated 99%.
"
by
David, ST's Ultimate Lover
I think it actually was HuffPo. But models have to allow for unexpected events like Comey to happen
Posted by
ty97
Jan 21 '17, 16:05
That's why 99% should never exist
Responses:
Could have been, but I tend to dismiss things on HuffPo as quickly as I would dismiss something from Fox. -- nm
-
Cuzzin Todd
Jan 21, 16:21
That's the problem with models predicated on history. Nothing can anticipate the unprecedented.
-
David, ST's Ultimate Lover
Jan 21, 16:09
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.